Ask a room of parents about children and technology, and the conversation often lands in the same place: screens are the problem, and less is always better. It is a tidy story, but it does not quite hold up. The children who go on to use technology well are rarely the ones who used it least. They are the ones who learned to use it on purpose.
That distinction matters, and it is worth unpicking some of the beliefs that get in the way.
Use Technology Thoughtfully
Myth: less screen time automatically means better habits
Cutting hours can feel like progress, and sometimes it is. But time is a blunt measure. Twenty minutes spent editing a short film, coding a simple game or researching a school project is not the same as twenty minutes of passive scrolling, even though the clock reads identically.
The more useful question is not how long, but what for. A child who understands why they are picking up a device tends to put it down more easily too. Focusing only on the total misses the part that actually shapes behaviour.
Reality: children copy what they see
Parents often assume the rules they set carry the most weight. In practice, children pay far closer attention to what the adults around them do. A parent who checks email through dinner while asking a child to switch off their tablet is sending two messages, and the louder one wins.
Modelling thoughtful use is quietly powerful. Narrating small choices out loud helps: “I’m putting my phone in the other room so I can concentrate,” or “let’s look that up properly rather than guess.” These are not lectures. They are demonstrations, and they stick.
Myth: schools should simply keep technology out of the way
There is a comforting idea that the best education is a low-tech one, and that classrooms should be a refuge from all things digital. Yet children will inherit a world built on these tools. Learning to use them with judgement is now part of a rounded education, not a distraction from it.
Well-considered schools treat this seriously rather than nervously. independent schools that build digital literacy into everyday learning give pupils the chance to question sources, protect their privacy and create rather than just consume. At Lady Eleanor Holles, that kind of measured approach sits alongside the wider aim of helping young people think for themselves.
Reality: boredom is useful, not a failure
Many parents feel a flicker of guilt when a child is bored, and reach for a device to fill the gap. It is an understandable instinct. But boredom is where curiosity, invention and patience get their practice. A child who never has to sit with an empty afternoon rarely learns what to do with one.
Allowing space for that, without rushing to fill it, teaches something no app can. It also makes technology feel like one option among many, rather than the default answer to every quiet moment.
Where this leaves parents
None of this asks for a ban, and none of it asks for a free-for-all. The middle ground is more demanding but far more effective: clear reasons, consistent example, honest conversation and room to be bored now and then.
Children raised this way do not fear technology, nor are they ruled by it. They treat it as a tool they control, which is really the whole point.
For families thinking about how a school’s ethos supports this kind of balance, more information is available at https://lehs.org.uk.
—
*This article was contributed by the team at Lady Eleanor Holles (LEH), an independent day school for girls in Hampton, South West London. Known for its academic strength and broad, forward-looking curriculum, LEH encourages pupils to approach learning, technology and the wider world with curiosity and independent judgement.*